previous    up   next

Conclusion on Adaptive Fusion



It is noted that the calculation of the degrees of consensus locally to each pixel provides a modification of the behaviour of adaptive fusion, which becomes more sensitive to the data to fuse. In fact, the progressive change from conjunctive fusion to disjunctive fusion disappeared.

With possibility distributions, the process passes gradually from a fusion of type conjunctive towards a fusion of type disjunctive because we define:

However in the case of scalars, there is no notion of intervals to which are applied fusions of different types. It is necessary on the other hand to determine if the involved scalars contribute to find a common plausible class (scalar not null) or not (null scalar):

The adaptive behaviour is then lost, and turned into a binary system where conjunctive fusion or disjunctive fusion is chosen depending on whether the unanimity for the classification of the pixel in a class has been obtained or not.

In addition, it should be noted that adaptive fusion is discontinuous around zero. If the possibility distributions have a very weak intersection, this one is used to apply a renormalized conjunctive fusion whereas the agreement of the sources for this area is weak. However, if the distributions are completely distinct, then conjunctive the fusion part is not used. Instead of a progressive transition from the state ``no conjunctive fusion'' to the state ``conjunctive fusion'' occurs a brutal one.

Lastly, the calculation of the height of the intersection between the possibility distributions presents the double disadvantage:






      previous    up   next     
  
 IRIT-UPS