previous    up   next

Relations between Possibility Measures and Necessity Measures



The properties of possibility measures and necessity measures suggest that they are associated.

The value of a necessity measure N can be obtained from a possibility measure $\Pi$, through the complement  $\complement_A$ of any part A of $\Omega$:

\begin{displaymath}\forall A \in \mathcal{P}(\Omega), N(A) = 1 - \Pi\left(\complement_A\right)\end{displaymath}
(43)

The more an event A is assigned a great necessity value, the less the complement event  $\complement_A$ is possible, therefore the more we are certain of the occurrence of  A.

The occurrence of event A is certain (N(A) = 1)  if and only if the occurrence of its complement   $\complement_A$ is impossible ( $\Pi\left(\complement_A\right) = 0$, therefore $\Pi(A) = 1$).

If possibility measure $\Pi$ is defined from possibility distribution $\pi$, necessity measure N, dual of $\Pi$, can be defined as:

\begin{displaymath}\forall A \in \mathcal{P}(\Omega), N(A) = \inf_{x \notin A}(1 - \pi(x))\end{displaymath}
(44)


The duality of $\Pi$ and N still appears in the following relations, for any part A of $\Omega$:

 
              $\textstyle \Pi(A) \geqslant N(A)$           
  (45)
 
$\textstyle \max(\Pi(A), 1-N(A)) = 1$
  (46)


These relations impose that, if $N(A) \neq 0$, then $\Pi(A) = 1$, which means that any event about which we are certain, at least a little, is completely possible.

In the same way, if $\Pi(A) \neq 1$, then N(A) = 0. This is interpreted by saying that we have no certainty about an event which is only relatively possible.



      previous    up   next     
  
 IRIT-UPS