Deceti.jpg (13851 bytes)

Remote Sensing Methodology Application Procedure

4.1 Introduction
4.2 Specific interpretation characteristics of remotely sensed imagery

4.1 Introduction


When the specialized photointerpreter investigates a part of the natural earth surface or a phenomenon/fact/event in the scene by the use of photointerpretation and remote sensing methods and techniques, he must have a good understanding of the overall Photointerpretation methodology he applies, closely depending on the basic principles of the scientific field underlying the investigation. In all cases, the following steps should be followed, in a holistic, systematic and integrated way:


1. Examine the basic elements constituting the position of the specific problem, including all their characteristics and their relations, interdependencies and interactions with the surrounding environment.
2. Collect, evaluate and use the existing general and specific informative material on the area under investigation.
3. Select the appropriate specific methodology or combination of methodologies for the problem under investigation.
4. Select the appropriate remote sensing technique.
5. Select the appropriate equipment for data processing.


So, the first step in applying remote sensing methods and techniques is to:

1.1 Define the nature of the problem and identify the scientific and technical possibilities for dealing with it, referring to:

1.1.1 the level of the basic human knowledge concerning the specific problem
1.1.2 the level of the relevant traditional methods which have been developed, and which could perhaps be supported by remote sensing methodologies
1.1.3 the level of the relevant available technology that can be applied.

1.2 Identify the limitations and constraints imposed by the specific problem concerning:
1.2.1 the results of methods that have been applied up to now under real natural and socioeconomic conditions
1.2.2 the margins resulting from the cost effectiveness and promptness of the techniques used
1.2.3 the available material/equipment to be used.

1.3 Evaluate the scientific/technical/technological personnel involved in the application of the appropriate photointerpretation and remote sensing methods and techniques.

1.4 Evaluate all the available spatial and qualitative information (literature) for the greater area under investigation, in order to support this specific study (e.g. cartographic, statistical, bibliographical, climatic etc data, thematic maps, aerial photographs, remotely sensed images etc).
 

 

4.2 Specific interpretation characteristics of remotely sensed images

TOP


The knowledge of the specific interpretation characteristics of each kind of aerial photographs or remotely sensed images is essential for the selection of the most convenient photointerpretation methods.Below, we present, the interpretation characteristics of:

a. Conventional aerial photographs.
b. Thermal infrared imagery.
c. LANDSAT images.
d. Radar images.

4.2.1 Specific interpretation characteristics of conventional aerial photographs

4.2.1.1 Panchromatic aerial photographs
Panchromatic aerial photographs are usually acquired with a yellow filter and are sensitive to visible light. Their reduced sensitivity in the green portion limits their specific ability to discriminate objects with different colours in the relevant application fields (forestry: reduced discrimination ability of different tree categories).
Panchromatic aerial photographs are used for most photointerpretation applications, because not only the appearance of objects’ shadows impede photointerpretation, but also trees, forestry roads, boundaries of a recently arable field and the general area’s morphology are clearly defined.
The panchromatic photointerpretation characteristics yield the best results in application fields such as urban planning, geography, geology, civil engineering projects, with photograph acquisitions during spring and summer seasons.

4.2.1.2 Infrared aerial photographs

They are especially sensitive in the portion of blue, mauve and reflected infrared radiation and are usually acquired with a red or a dark filter. In infrared aerial photographs, the surfaces of water concentrations (without admixture, mud etc.), absorb the infrared radiation, so they are presented in extremely dark tones (black) and this characteristic facilitates the easier detection of tributaries, river-beds with current flow, networks of natural surface drainage, swamps, irrigation or drainage canals, tidal lines and coastlines.
Infrared aerial photographs represent reality more clearly than the panchromatic ones in cases of fog and suspension of dust particles in the air.
However, this advantage becomes less important in the case of a thick fog or of an extremely humid atmosphere with heavy cloud cover.
Infrared aerial photographs can also present better differences between arable and non-arable land and between broad-leaved trees (which have high reflectance and are therefore presented in bright tones) and coniferous ones (which absorb the infrared radiance and are presented in dark tones). This characteristic of infrared aerial photograph interpretation helps the identification of different timber types and also, the detection of green colour “camouflage” (green colour doesn’t reflect infrared radiance) or of “cut” (dead) vegetation.

It is obvious, that the above-mentioned characteristics are disadvantages for some photointerpretation applications, because:


a. The water (dark) image, objectively eliminates some tone differences and consequently, reefs, obstacles in straights or canals, shallow marshes etc. can not be distinguished.

b. The intense (dark) shadows of infrared aerial photographs hide useful information.

c. The use of red filter helps discriminate better different vegetation types (because of increased tone differences), but at the same time it reduces the sharpness of the image.

d. The non-conventional tone correspondence (depending on the photointerpreter’s conception criteria), can cause confusion during the mono-image identification, for example of light-coloured objects (such as dusty roads/broad – leafed low trees).

As a result of their specific photointerpretation characteristics, infrared aerial photographs are more suitable for applications like natural resource inventories and monitoring especially in forestry, ecology and flora and fauna management, with photographic acquisition early in the spring and late in the summer.

4.2.1.3 Coloured aerial photographs

In order to take satisfactory coloured aerial photographs (sensitive to visible light) not only the right lighting and acquisition geometry disposal conditions are required, but also the appropriate use of filters.
coloured aerial photographs are more reliable than panchromatic and infrared ones on the presentation of objects colour gradation, because they can “understand” and present a wider scale of colour shade than, for example panchromatic photographs in the case of grey’s gradation.
They are therefore valuable in the identification of different soil categories, surface rocks, coast types, hydrographical controls and exploration of shallow water concentration bottoms because of the possibility of water-transparency compared to the panchromatic photographs.

4.2.1.4 Coloured infrared aerial photographs

The need for photointerpretation to discriminate between “healthy” vegetation and leafage camouflages absorbing the infrared radiance has lead the development of coloured-infrared aerial photograph applications and techniques.
The specific photointerpretation characteristics of coloured infrared aerial photographs mainly guarantee: the possibility of identifying objects during the comparative photointerpretation process with coloured aerial photographs of the same areas.
They also permit:
BULLET.JPG (677 bytes) The detection of plant diseases on the beginning or on the first stage of evolution and expansion and forest damages, caused by the same insect categories.
BULLET.JPG (677 bytes) The mapping of different tree types, depending on the infrared radiance reflectance of leafage.
BULLET.JPG (677 bytes) The discrimination between evergreen and deciduous trees of the same colour, because the “healthy” deciduous trees reflect the infrared radiance much more than the evergreen ones during the period in which they have leaves .

4.2.1.5 Multi-spectral aerial photographs

Multi-spectral aerial photographs are acquired with special photogrammetric cameras carrying four or more lenses. They look like coloured infrared ones with the help of appropriate filters and they offer us the possibility to reveal interesting natural, chemical and biological characteristics, which for certain reasons are presented in a different way on the relevant images when we change the colour, the density and the shades of colour with a specific viewer .

Today, there are a lot of applications for multi-spectral aerial photographs in forestry, agriculture, geomorphology, natural resource inventories, environmental pollution monitoring etc.

4.2.2 Specific interpretation characteristics of thermal infrared images
The thermal infrared (optico-mechanical) scanners are remote sensors, sensitive to changes of the reflected object’s temperature, which are recorded as tone gradation.
So, in a positive print of thermal infrared image, the brighter tones indicate objects with high absolute temperature.
The thermal infrared images are not at all and in any case corresponding to the conventional aerial photographs, because they are based on the surfaces emissivity and not on the surfaces sensitivity of reflected light.
The basic source of the surfaces reflected or emitted thermal radiance is the solar radiance. So, during daytime, surfaces of high absorbance store a great quantity of temperature, although the exactly opposite happens to surfaces with high reflectance.
Consequently, the thermal infrared image acquisition time influences the quality and the quantity of data recorded.

4.2.3 Specific interpretation characteristics of LANDSAT images
There is a basic structural difference between conventional aerial photographs and LANDSAT images (stereoscopic vs monoscopic): in the first case, in spite of rays' deviation caused by the relief, which permits the stereoscopic vision of the overlap of two successive aerial photographs, the scanning process of multi-spectral scanners (MSS) permits the one-dimensional conception of relief only to the scanning direction.
In the second case, we obtain an image of the scanning line image with the sensor perpendicularly projected on the image’s center, so, the base to the axis of image acquisition is practically zero and consequently, LANDSAT images stereovision is impossible at this direction.
At the equator sane overlap is 14% whereas in latitude 80o it becomes 85%. The distance between two successive scanning centerlines is 159 Km.

4.2.4 Specific interpretation characteristics of Radar images
The Radar (Radio Detection and Ranging) is a microwave active remote sensing system working in the area 0.3 – 100 cm of the electromagnetic spectrum, which functions in all lighting and weather conditions existing in the area under investigation.
The SLAR (Side Looking Airborne Radar) system, in its typical form, consists of a system of a transmitter–antenna and a receiver of electromagnetic energy scattered on the ground and recorded by the system.
Depending on the object’s orientation to the SLAR’s antenna direction, its texture, shape, form and electric properties, we either have strong return signals (which means clear tones on the image) or weaker signals (different tone gradations) or weak to zero return signals (dark or black tone).
So, a hill oriented parallel to the SLAR’s flight axis direction is represented on a radar image by a clear tone and so does (but for different reasons) a storehouse metallic roof.

Reference:.Rokos, D. “Photointerpretation and Remote Sensing”, NTUA, 1979

     


TOP

ntualogo.GIF (15016 bytes)

National Technical University of Athens
Dept. of Rural & Surveying Engineering
Laboratory of Remote Sensing